World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · CD

DR Congo country risk and resilience

DR Congo country risk and resilience: ranked #157 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

DR Congo instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feed85 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open DR Congo on the live map →

Recent developments in DR Congo

Country brief

What this means for DR Congo

The Do Not Travel advisory for Congo - Kinshasa reflects the severe security risks that drive people to flee violence. [2][E1]

Congo - Kinshasa's military drone imports from rival suppliers may increase its exposure to US and Iran sanctions, given its 85 OFAC and SEMA designations. [1][E2]

Key risks

Congo - Kinshasa's 85 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations pose a risk of further financial restrictions. [E2]

Watch items

The outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in Democratic Republic of the Congo remains unresolved. [4]

World Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Do Not Travel ·
  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 85 ·

Automated summary of 3 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#157
Overall score38.2
Dimension coverage83%
ConfidenceStandard

DR Congo resilience analysis

DR Congo ranks #157 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 38.2 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 45.5, with recovery capacity next at 52.7. Live shock exposure is strongest at 60.5, while Social and governance is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 36.6. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.3 points. Dimension coverage is 83%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity6100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity9100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water14100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure16100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance19100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance21100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure25100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance2692%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity3280%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity4176%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity51100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance5855%Stale
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5985%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance60100%Stale
Import concentrationRecovery capacity79100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9382%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security9490%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity95100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Zimbabwe (#156, 38.3), Central African Republic (#158, 37.8), Cameroon (#155, 39), Ethiopia (#159, 37.2). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Zimbabwe (#156, 38.3), Eritrea, Central African Republic (#158, 37.8), Cameroon (#155, 39), Ethiopia (#159, 37.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links DR Congo to DR Congo conflict. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 94. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about DR Congo

What is DR Congo's resilience score?

DR Congo scores 38.2 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #157 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for DR Congo?

Structural readiness is lowest at 45.5, followed by Recovery capacity at 52.7. Their evidence coverage is 87% and 63%.

Is DR Congo's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.3 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect DR Congo are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.