Marshall Islands resilience analysis
World Monitor does not publish a resilience score or rank for Marshall Islands because it does not meet the published ranking eligibility criteria. Marshall Islands is in the rankable universe as a UN member. Ranked comparisons use East Asia and the Pacific peers rather than other unpublished pages. The snapshot records Marshall Islands as MH.
Why Marshall Islands is unpublished
Marshall Islands's coverage is 63%, below the 65% ranking floor.
Source inventory gaps
Information environment, External-debt coverage, Import concentration, and Liquid-reserve adequacy have no usable observed series. Those slots depend on Reporters Without Borders, World Bank, and UN Comtrade, which do not contribute observed series for those dimensions. External-debt coverage, Import concentration, and Liquid-reserve adequacy are tagged unmonitored because the source does not cover Marshall Islands.
What the snapshot does cover
Observed evidence is present for Border security (100%), Cyber and digital capacity (100%), Fiscal space (100%), Governance and institutions (100%), Health and public services (100%), and State continuity (100%). Input coverage is 63% and imputation share is 17%.
Dimension evidence inventory
Showing 12 of 21 active dimensions, weakest evidence first; 7 more at full coverage; 2 omitted for brevity.
- Sovereign fiscal buffer: 0% coverage; not applicable.
- Information environment: 0% coverage; Reporters Without Borders does not contribute observed series for Marshall Islands.
- External-debt coverage: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Marshall Islands.
- Import concentration: 30% coverage; UN Comtrade does not contribute observed series for Marshall Islands.
- Liquid-reserve adequacy: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Marshall Islands.
- Energy system resilience: 50% coverage; observed.
- Logistics and supply chains: 50% coverage; observed.
- Financial-system exposure: 65% coverage; observed.
- Core infrastructure: 70% coverage; observed.
- Education capacity: 80% coverage; observed.
- Macro-fiscal position: 80% coverage; observed.
- Food and water security: 82% coverage; observed.
Nearest ranked comparators
Nearest ranked comparators: Australia, Brunei, Solomon Islands, Mongolia. Ranked comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Australia, Brunei, Solomon Islands, Mongolia, Singapore. Links do not use unpublished scores.
Tracked crisis context
Marshall Islands has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Evidence comes from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Marshall Islands coverage is 63% with imputation share 17%. No score is published.
Questions about Marshall Islands
What is Marshall Islands's resilience score?
No resilience score or rank is published for Marshall Islands. Marshall Islands's published rank would require coverage of at least 65%, no low-confidence flag, and either a population of at least 200,000 or coverage of at least 85%. Low confidence for Marshall Islands means coverage falls below 55% or imputation share exceeds 40%.
What evidence is available for Marshall Islands?
Observed evidence is present for Border security (100%), Cyber and digital capacity (100%), Fiscal space (100%), Governance and institutions (100%), Health and public services (100%), and State continuity (100%). Input coverage is 63% and imputation share is 17%.
How should readers use Marshall Islands's page?
Use the evidence inventory and nearest ranked comparators with the live monitor. A missing score does not mean risk is absent.