World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · TT

Trinidad and Tobago country risk and resilience

Trinidad and Tobago country risk and resilience: ranked #80 of 170 in World Monitor's index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Trinidad and Tobago instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputReconsider Travel
OFAC designations in feed1 designated entity
Live enhancement pending
Open Trinidad and Tobago on the live map →

Recent developments in Trinidad and Tobago

Country brief

What this means for Trinidad and Tobago

The death of Mighty Sparrow may affect cultural tourism, even as the most severe government travel advisory for Trinidad & Tobago is Reconsider Travel. [1][E1]

Key risks

Trinidad & Tobago's link to 1 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designation could pose compliance risks for foreign investors. [E2]

World Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Reconsider Travel ·
  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 1 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#80
Overall score54.1
Dimension coverage75%
ConfidenceStandard

Trinidad and Tobago resilience analysis

Trinidad and Tobago ranks #80 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 54.1 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 56.4, with structural readiness next at 65. Live shock exposure is strongest at 82.8, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 56.4. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.9 points. Dimension coverage is 75%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity40100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity43100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity47100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance50100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity64100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6692%Stale
State continuityRecovery capacity66100%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity6865%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance71100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7590%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water75100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity7595%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7755%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance78100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water8582%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Armenia (#79, 54.1), Vanuatu (#81, 54.1), Hong Kong (#78, 54.2), El Salvador (#82, 54). Comparisons in Latin America and the Caribbean: El Salvador (#82, 54), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Panama (#76, 54.5), Guyana (#86, 53.5), Jamaica (#74, 55.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Trinidad and Tobago has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 93.3. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Trinidad and Tobago

What is Trinidad and Tobago's resilience score?

Trinidad and Tobago scores 54.1 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #80 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Trinidad and Tobago?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 56.4, followed by Structural readiness at 65. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 88%.

Is Trinidad and Tobago's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.9 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Trinidad and Tobago are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.