World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · GW

Guinea-Bissau country risk and resilience

Guinea-Bissau country risk and resilience: ranked #151 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Guinea-Bissau instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputReconsider Travel
OFAC designations in feedNone in feed
Live enhancement pending
Open Guinea-Bissau on the live map →

Recent developments in Guinea-Bissau

Country brief

What this means for Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau's reaffirmation of support for Morocco's territorial integrity may strengthen diplomatic ties with Morocco, potentially influencing its net energy import dependency of 0%. [3][E2]

Key risks

The most severe government travel advisory for Guinea-Bissau is Reconsider Travel, indicating elevated safety risks for travelers. [E1]

World Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Reconsider Travel ·
  • E2 · Net energy import dependency: 0% ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#151
Overall score40.1
Dimension coverage73%
ConfidenceStandard

Guinea-Bissau resilience analysis

Guinea-Bissau ranks #151 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 40.1 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 50.7, with recovery capacity next at 53.8. Structural readiness is strongest at 55.2, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 41. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.3 points. Dimension coverage is 73%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Education capacitySocial and governance10100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure22100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water23100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure27100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance28100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity4580%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity47100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity54100%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity55100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water59100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6392%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security6970%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity69100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7155%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance91100%Stale
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Import concentrationRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Haiti (#150, 40.5), Nigeria (#152, 39.9), Burundi (#149, 40.7), Benin (#153, 39.5). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Nigeria (#152, 39.9), Benin (#153, 39.5), Burundi (#149, 40.7), Eswatini (#146, 41), Mozambique (#154, 39.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Guinea-Bissau has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 69. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Guinea-Bissau

What is Guinea-Bissau's resilience score?

Guinea-Bissau scores 40.1 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #151 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Guinea-Bissau?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 50.7, followed by Recovery capacity at 53.8. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 36%.

Is Guinea-Bissau's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.3 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Guinea-Bissau are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.