World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · KR

South Korea Country Instability Index

South Korea's Country Instability Index is 32/100 · Normal, unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of .

CII measures current stress. World Monitor's separate Country Resilience Index measures South Korea's longer-term structural capacity.

Official name: Republic of Korea. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

South Korea instability monitor

Published pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score32Normal
24-hour comparison-window movementUnchanged
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed5 designated entities
Open South Korea on the live map →

Recent developments in South Korea

South Korea's Country Instability Index is 32/100 · Normal, unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of . Reporting captured in the same window is listed below.

Country brief

What this means for South Korea

The diplomatic dispute with Ukraine could complicate South Korea's energy security, given its net energy import dependency of 85%. [1][E4]

Key risks

South Korea's 85% net energy import dependency makes it vulnerable to disruptions at the Korea Strait shipping chokepoint. [E4][E5]

Watch items

Whether Ukraine will respond to South Korea's demand for an apology over the North Korean POW disclosure. [1][2][5]

World Monitor data cited

Automated summary of 3 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#58
Overall score57.3
Dimension coverage77%
ConfidenceStandard

South Korea resilience analysis

South Korea ranks #58 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 57.3 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 62.2, with live shock exposure next at 71.9. Structural readiness is strongest at 74.8, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 62.2. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.5 points. Dimension coverage is 77%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity3100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity50100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water5982%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity64100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity65100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security6790%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6992%Stale
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance70100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7655%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance77100%Stale
State continuityRecovery capacity77100%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7876%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity8085%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance82100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity83100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity89100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water91100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Singapore (#57, 57.4), Georgia (#59, 56.8), Brazil (#56, 57.4), Paraguay (#60, 56.7). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Mongolia (#55, 57.4), Singapore (#57, 57.4), Malaysia (#61, 56.6), Solomon Islands (#52, 58.3), Fiji (#66, 55.9). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

South Korea has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 76.6. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about South Korea

What is South Korea's Country Instability Index?

South Korea's Country Instability Index is 32/100 (Normal), unchanged over a 24-hour comparison window, as of Sep 28, 2026, 4:51 AM UTC.

What is South Korea's resilience score?

South Korea scores 57.3 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #58 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for South Korea?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 62.2, followed by Live shock exposure at 71.9. Their evidence coverage is 66% and 85%.

Is South Korea's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.5 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect South Korea are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.