World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · MY

Malaysia country risk and resilience

Malaysia country risk and resilience: ranked #61 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Malaysia instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed44 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Malaysia on the live map →

Recent developments in Malaysia

Country brief

What this means for Malaysia

The discussion on strengthening economic partnership with the Malaysian Chamber of Commerce may be affected by Malaysia's link to 44 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations. [1][E2]

Key risks

Malaysia's link to 44 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations poses a risk of increased scrutiny in international trade and finance. [E2]

Watch items

The outcome of the discussion between the General Authority for Exhibitions & Conferences and the Malaysian Chamber of Commerce on strengthening economic partnership is unresolved. [1]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 44 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 World Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#61
Overall score56.6
Dimension coverage76%
ConfidenceStandard

Malaysia resilience analysis

Malaysia ranks #61 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 56.6 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 63.6, with structural readiness next at 66.5. Live shock exposure is strongest at 76.4, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 63.6. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -1.1 points. Dimension coverage is 76%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity31100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance5755%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity58100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance59100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity61100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity68100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water70100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance7292%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance73100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance75100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7665%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7890%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity78100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity83100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9282%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Paraguay (#60, 56.7), Belize (#62, 56.6), Georgia (#59, 56.8), Oman (#63, 56.5). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: South Korea (#58, 57.3), Fiji (#66, 55.9), Mongolia (#55, 57.4), Singapore (#57, 57.4), China (#70, 55.3). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Malaysia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 79.9. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Malaysia

What is Malaysia's resilience score?

Malaysia scores 56.6 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #61 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Malaysia?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 63.6, followed by Structural readiness at 66.5. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 88%.

Is Malaysia's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -1.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Malaysia are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.