Tuvalu resilience evidence
Tuvalu enters the rankable universe as a UN member, but this edition starts from its available Pacific evidence instead of estimating a national result. The observed record reaches 62% coverage and remains below the publication gate.
Source inventory gaps
Tuvalu's very small reporting population falls below the standalone reporting thresholds used by several international series. In this snapshot, the World Bank external-debt and liquid-reserve slots have no standalone Tuvalu observation. UN Comtrade also leaves import concentration unmonitored, while Reporters Without Borders supplies no information-environment reading. These omissions leave coverage at 62%, 3 points below the 65% publication floor.
What the snapshot does cover
Available Tuvalu inputs produce 15 supported dimension readings: Macro-fiscal position 87 (80%); Currency and external balance 60 (85%); Trade policy resilience 100 (100%); Financial-system exposure 71 (65%); Cyber and digital capacity 100 (100%); Logistics and supply chains 100 (50%); Core infrastructure 79 (70%); Energy system resilience 97 (50%); Governance and institutions 61 (100%); Border security 100 (100%); Education capacity 34 (80%); Health and public services 65 (100%); Food and water security 93 (82%); Fiscal space 67 (100%); State continuity 78 (100%). The observed source mix includes IMF, World Bank, WTO, UCDP, and FAO IPC. Each value describes one dimension; none is an overall score or country rank.
Dimension evidence inventory
Showing 12 of 21 active dimensions, weakest evidence first; 7 more at full coverage; 2 omitted for brevity.
Social cohesion is observed but below the 50% coverage a supported reading needs, so it is recorded here without counting as supported readings.
- Sovereign fiscal buffer: 0% coverage; not applicable.
- Information environment: 0% coverage; Reporters Without Borders does not contribute observed series for Tuvalu.
- External-debt coverage: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Tuvalu.
- Import concentration: 30% coverage; UN Comtrade does not contribute observed series for Tuvalu.
- Liquid-reserve adequacy: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Tuvalu.
- Social cohesion: 37% coverage; observed.
- Energy system resilience: 50% coverage; observed.
- Logistics and supply chains: 50% coverage; observed.
- Financial-system exposure: 65% coverage; observed.
- Core infrastructure: 70% coverage; observed.
- Education capacity: 80% coverage; observed.
- Macro-fiscal position: 80% coverage; observed.
Nearest ranked comparators
Pacific context comes from ranked regional reference pages. Nearest ranked comparators: Samoa, New Zealand, Japan, Australia, Brunei. They provide transparent reference points without filling Tuvalu gaps from another country.
Tracked crisis context
No fixed crawlable crisis tracker has Tuvalu in scope. This means that the current registry of 14 tracker desks does not include the country; it does not describe present risk.
Reading limits
Read the August 29, 2026 Tuvalu record as a partial source inventory under pillar-combined-penalized-v1. Coverage of 62% and imputation of 18% are input-quality facts, not a concealed national score.
Questions about Tuvalu
Why is no Tuvalu resilience rank shown?
Tuvalu is below the 65% coverage floor because its very small reporting population leaves World Bank debt and reserve observations, UN Comtrade import concentration, and the Reporters Without Borders information reading unavailable as standalone inputs in this snapshot.
What evidence is available for Tuvalu?
The page contains 15 observed dimension readings, including Food and water security, Fiscal space, and State continuity. Use them separately with their coverage values; do not combine them into an unpublished score.
What is the right comparison for Tuvalu?
Use the named Pacific ranked references to understand scale and regional context. Their published scores do not replace Tuvalu source gaps.