World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · JP

Japan Country Instability Index

Japan's Country Instability Index is 26/100 · Low, up 12 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of .

CII measures current stress. World Monitor's separate Country Resilience Index measures Japan's longer-term structural capacity.

Current signal

Japan instability monitor

Published pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score26Low
24-hour comparison-window movementRising +12
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed22 designated entities
Open Japan on the live map →

Recent developments in Japan

Japan's Country Instability Index is 26/100 · Low, up 12 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of . Reporting captured in the same window is listed below.

Country brief

What this means for Japan

Japan's high net energy import dependency of 87% makes the corporate services inflation increase particularly concerning for energy-intensive sectors. [1][E4]

Key risks

Japan's 87% net energy import dependency exposes it to supply disruption risks through the Korea Strait chokepoint. [E4][E5]

Japan is linked to 22 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, posing potential diplomatic and economic friction risks. [E3]

Watch items

It remains to be seen whether Nissan's business reshaping in Japan will succeed in supporting its global growth push. [3]

World Monitor data cited

  • E3 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 22 ·
  • E4 · Net energy import dependency: 87% ·
  • E5 · Chokepoint tracker: Korea Strait ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 3 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#5
Overall score71.3
Dimension coverage75%
ConfidenceStandard

Japan resilience analysis

Japan ranks #5 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 71.3 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 77.7, with recovery capacity next at 79.6. Structural readiness is strongest at 83, while Energy security is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 61. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +2.4 points. Dimension coverage is 75%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Energy system resilienceEnergy security6190%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity67100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7555%Stale
Border securitySocial and governance76100%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7876%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water7882%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance79100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity81100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance82100%Stale
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity82100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity83100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity83100%Stale
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water87100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance9180%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity10085%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity100100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Denmark (#4, 72.5), New Zealand (#6, 68.8), Iceland (#3, 74.6), Czechia (#7, 68.8). Comparisons in East Asia and the Pacific: Palau, New Zealand (#6, 68.8), Micronesia, Samoa (#8, 67.4), Macau. Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Japan has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 87. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Japan

What is Japan's Country Instability Index?

Japan's Country Instability Index is 26/100 (Low), up 12 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of Sep 28, 2026, 4:51 AM UTC.

What is Japan's resilience score?

Japan scores 71.3 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #5 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Japan?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 77.7, followed by Recovery capacity at 79.6. Their evidence coverage is 85% and 54%.

Is Japan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +2.4 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Japan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.