World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · UZ

Uzbekistan country risk and resilience

Uzbekistan country risk and resilience: ranked #39 of 170 in World Monitor's index, with current instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Uzbekistan instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed25 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Uzbekistan on the live map →

Recent developments in Uzbekistan

Country brief

What this means for Uzbekistan

The extradition of a U.S.-Uzbek citizen for terrorism support highlights security concerns despite the country's low government travel advisory rating. [1][E1]

Key risks

Uzbekistan's link to 25 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations poses a risk for international business dealings. [E2]

Watch items

The outcome of the C5+1 talks led by Rubio with a major U.S. business delegation to Uzbekistan remains unresolved. [4]

World Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Exercise Normal Precautions ·
  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 25 ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#39
Overall score60.6
Dimension coverage81%
ConfidenceStandard

Uzbekistan resilience analysis

Uzbekistan ranks #39 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 60.6 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 68.6, with live shock exposure next at 72.5. Recovery capacity is strongest at 76, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 62.3. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -2.9 points. Dimension coverage is 81%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance39100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance4055%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water5382%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5585%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity58100%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity65100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6692%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water70100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity70100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity7095%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7990%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity79100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity84100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity93100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance97100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance98100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Croatia (#38, 60.6), Greece (#40, 60.5), Hungary (#37, 61.2), Estonia (#41, 60.4). Comparisons in Europe: Croatia (#38, 60.6), Greece (#40, 60.5), Estonia (#41, 60.4), Hungary (#37, 61.2), Poland (#36, 61.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Uzbekistan has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 79. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Uzbekistan

What is Uzbekistan's resilience score?

Uzbekistan scores 60.6 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #39 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Uzbekistan?

Structural readiness is lowest at 68.6, followed by Live shock exposure at 72.5. Their evidence coverage is 92% and 85%.

Is Uzbekistan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -2.9 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Uzbekistan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.