Chile resilience analysis
Chile ranks #51 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 58.7 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 62.5, with structural readiness next at 70.6. Live shock exposure is strongest at 81.3, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 62.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.1 points. Dimension coverage is 75%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 62.5; coverage 54%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 70.6; coverage 88%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 81.3; coverage 85%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 62.5; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 29; high Import concentration 77.
- Economic capacity: 70; weight 17%; low Macro-fiscal position 58; high Trade policy resilience 84.
- Social and governance: 71.1; weight 19%; low Social cohesion 63; high Border security 80.
- Infrastructure: 75; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 31; high Cyber and digital capacity 95.
- Energy security: 83; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 83.
- Health, food and water: 85.7; weight 13%; low Health and public services 83; high Food and water security 89.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 29 | 100% | Fresh |
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 31 | 50% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 58 | 95% | Fresh |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 59 | 100% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 63 | 92% | Stale |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 66 | 100% | Fresh |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 70 | 100% | Stale |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 72 | 85% | Fresh |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 74 | 55% | Stale |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | 75 | 100% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 77 | 100% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 78 | 65% | Fresh |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 78 | 70% | Fresh |
| Border security | Social and governance | 80 | 100% | Stale |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 83 | 90% | Fresh |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 83 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 84 | 100% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 89 | 82% | Fresh |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 95 | 100% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: Azerbaijan (#50, 58.8), Solomon Islands (#52, 58.3), Romania (#49, 58.9), Israel (#53, 57.7). Comparisons in Latin America and the Caribbean: Grenada, Brazil (#56, 57.4), Peru (#42, 60.4), Dominica, Paraguay (#60, 56.7). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Chile has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 85.7. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Chile
What is Chile's resilience score?
Chile scores 58.7 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #51 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Chile?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 62.5, followed by Structural readiness at 70.6. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 88%.
Is Chile's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.