Czechia resilience analysis
Czechia ranks #7 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 68.8 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 73.6, with structural readiness next at 80.3. Live shock exposure is strongest at 82.1, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 73.6. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.3 points. Dimension coverage is 77%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 73.6; coverage 54%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 80.3; coverage 90%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 82.1; coverage 88%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 73.6; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 60; high Import concentration 83.
- Infrastructure: 77.6; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 31; high Cyber and digital capacity 100.
- Social and governance: 78.2; weight 19%; low Border security 72; high Education capacity 94.
- Economic capacity: 82.5; weight 17%; low Financial-system exposure 67; high Trade policy resilience 97.
- Health, food and water: 83.5; weight 13%; low Health and public services 83; high Food and water security 84.
- Energy security: 85; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 85.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 31 | 50% | Fresh |
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 60 | 100% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 67 | 76% | Fresh |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 70 | 100% | Fresh |
| Border security | Social and governance | 72 | 100% | Stale |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 73 | 100% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 75 | 92% | Stale |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 78 | 100% | Stale |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 79 | 70% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 80 | 100% | Fresh |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 83 | 100% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 83 | 100% | Fresh |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 84 | 85% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 84 | 82% | Fresh |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 85 | 100% | Fresh |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 90 | 55% | Stale |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | 94 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 97 | 100% | Fresh |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 100 | 100% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: New Zealand (#6, 68.8), Samoa (#8, 67.4), Japan (#5, 71.3), Luxembourg (#9, 67.1). Comparisons in Europe: Andorra, Luxembourg (#9, 67.1), Sweden (#10, 66.9), Monaco, Finland (#12, 65.6). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Czechia has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 85. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Czechia
What is Czechia's resilience score?
Czechia scores 68.8 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #7 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Czechia?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 73.6, followed by Structural readiness at 80.3. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 90%.
Is Czechia's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.3 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.