World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · LU

Luxembourg country risk and resilience

Luxembourg country risk and resilience: ranked #9 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

Luxembourg instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed22 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Luxembourg on the live map →

Recent developments in Luxembourg

Country brief

What this means for Luxembourg

The European Commission's visit underscores Luxembourg's focus on industrial innovation, even as the country's 91% net energy import dependency exposes it to fuel price volatility. [2][3][E3]

Key risks

Luxembourg's 91% net energy import dependency makes it vulnerable to supply disruptions or price spikes in imported energy. [E3]

Luxembourg is linked to 22 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, posing potential compliance and reputational risks. [E2]

Watch items

Whether the rise in the cost of unleaded fuel in Luxembourg will continue or stabilize. [4][5]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 22 ·
  • E3 · Net energy import dependency: 91% ·

Automated summary of 4 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#9
Overall score67.1
Dimension coverage76%
ConfidenceStandard

Luxembourg resilience analysis

Luxembourg ranks #9 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 67.1 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 68.4, with structural readiness next at 82.5. Live shock exposure is strongest at 84.5, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 68.4. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0 points. Dimension coverage is 76%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity0100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7276%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity76100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity77100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance79100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance82100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance85100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity8795%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security88100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water89100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity89100%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9182%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance9292%Stale
Information environmentSocial and governance9355%Stale
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure95100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Samoa (#8, 67.4), Sweden (#10, 66.9), Czechia (#7, 68.8), United Arab Emirates (#11, 66.5). Comparisons in Europe: Sweden (#10, 66.9), Monaco, Andorra, Finland (#12, 65.6), Czechia (#7, 68.8). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Luxembourg has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 89.9. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Luxembourg

What is Luxembourg's resilience score?

Luxembourg scores 67.1 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #9 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Luxembourg?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 68.4, followed by Structural readiness at 82.5. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 89%.

Is Luxembourg's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Luxembourg are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.