World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · DK

Denmark country risk and resilience

Denmark country risk and resilience: ranked #4 of 170 in World Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Denmark instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed3 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Denmark on the live map →

Recent developments in Denmark

Country brief

What this means for Denmark

Denmark's net energy import dependency of 38% makes it vulnerable to potential energy disruptions during a period of heightened Russian hybrid activity. [2][E3]

Key risks

Denmark's net energy import dependency of 38% poses a risk of energy supply disruptions amid rising hybrid threats. [E3]

Outlook

A Polymarket market on a Danish snap election by December 31 is priced at 7% Yes as of Sep 28, 2026, and closes Jan 1, 2027. [E4]

Watch items

It remains to be seen whether the viral video claiming Denmark trolled Trump and Rubio will have diplomatic repercussions. [1]

The outcome of the Polymarket market on a Danish snap election called by December 31 is unresolved. [E4]

World Monitor data cited

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#4
Overall score72.5
Dimension coverage77%
ConfidenceStandard

Denmark resilience analysis

Denmark ranks #4 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 72.5 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 75.9, with structural readiness next at 82.3. Live shock exposure is strongest at 87.1, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 75.9. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.6 points. Dimension coverage is 77%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity31100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance75100%Stale
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance8092%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity81100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water8382%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance85100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity8576%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity85100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance86100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity88100%Stale
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity92100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water93100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance9355%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security95100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity97100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Iceland (#3, 74.6), Japan (#5, 71.3), Norway (#2, 75.4), New Zealand (#6, 68.8). Comparisons in Europe: Iceland (#3, 74.6), Norway (#2, 75.4), Czechia (#7, 68.8), Liechtenstein, Switzerland (#1, 76.8). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Denmark has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 95. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Denmark

What is Denmark's resilience score?

Denmark scores 72.5 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #4 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Denmark?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 75.9, followed by Structural readiness at 82.3. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 90%.

Is Denmark's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.6 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Denmark are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.