Liechtenstein resilience analysis
World Monitor does not publish a resilience score or rank for Liechtenstein because it does not meet the published ranking eligibility criteria. Liechtenstein is in the rankable universe as a UN member. Ranked comparisons use Europe peers rather than other unpublished pages. The snapshot records Liechtenstein as LI.
Why Liechtenstein is unpublished
Liechtenstein's coverage is 56%, below the 65% ranking floor.
Source inventory gaps
Education capacity, External-debt coverage, Import concentration, and Liquid-reserve adequacy have no usable observed series. Those slots depend on World Bank and UN Comtrade, which do not contribute observed series for those dimensions. Education capacity, External-debt coverage, Import concentration, and Liquid-reserve adequacy are tagged unmonitored because the source does not cover Liechtenstein.
What the snapshot does cover
This is a partial evidence snapshot. Liechtenstein has 14 supported dimension readings with observed inputs: Macro-fiscal position 78 (95%); Currency and external balance 55 (85%); Trade policy resilience 76 (64%); Financial-system exposure 78 (76%); Cyber and digital capacity 100 (100%); Logistics and supply chains 100 (50%); Core infrastructure 79 (70%); Governance and institutions 82 (100%); Social cohesion 97 (92%); Border security 85 (100%); Information environment 93 (55%); Food and water security 93 (82%); Fiscal space 88 (100%); State continuity 91 (100%). Scores use a 0-100 scale; percentages show coverage. Possible dimension inputs for Liechtenstein: IMF, World Bank, WTO, UCDP, and FAO IPC. Inputs tied only to missing or unmonitored dimensions in Liechtenstein: UN Comtrade. For Liechtenstein, some feed families span supported and missing dimensions: World Bank. These readings are partial evidence, not a published overall score or a country rank.
Dimension evidence inventory
Showing 12 of 21 active dimensions, weakest evidence first; 5 more at full coverage; 4 omitted for brevity.
Energy system resilience and Health and public services are observed but below the 50% coverage a supported reading needs, so they are recorded here without counting as supported readings.
- Sovereign fiscal buffer: 0% coverage; not applicable.
- Education capacity: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Liechtenstein.
- External-debt coverage: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Liechtenstein.
- Import concentration: 30% coverage; UN Comtrade does not contribute observed series for Liechtenstein.
- Liquid-reserve adequacy: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for Liechtenstein.
- Energy system resilience: 15% coverage; observed.
- Health and public services: 15% coverage; observed.
- Logistics and supply chains: 50% coverage; observed.
- Information environment: 55% coverage; observed.
- Trade policy resilience: 64% coverage; observed.
- Core infrastructure: 70% coverage; observed.
- Financial-system exposure: 76% coverage; observed.
Nearest ranked comparators
Nearest ranked comparators: Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Denmark. Ranked comparisons in Europe: Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Czechia. Links do not use unpublished scores.
Tracked crisis context
Liechtenstein has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Evidence comes from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Liechtenstein coverage is 56% with imputation share 26%. No score is published.
Questions about Liechtenstein
What is Liechtenstein's resilience score?
No resilience score or rank is published for Liechtenstein. Liechtenstein's published rank would require coverage of at least 65%, no low-confidence flag, and either a population of at least 200,000 or coverage of at least 85%. Low confidence for Liechtenstein means coverage falls below 55% or imputation share exceeds 40%.
What evidence is available for Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein has 14 supported dimension readings with observed inputs, including Food and water security, Fiscal space, and State continuity. Possible inputs for Liechtenstein include UCDP, Reporters Without Borders, and FAO IPC. These readings are partial evidence, not a published overall score or a country rank.
How should readers use Liechtenstein's page?
Use the evidence inventory and nearest ranked comparators with the live monitor. A missing score does not mean risk is absent.