World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · LT

Lithuania country risk and resilience

Lithuania country risk and resilience: ranked #26 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Lithuania instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed7 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Lithuania on the live map →

Recent developments in Lithuania

Country brief

Key risks

Lithuania is linked to 7 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations as of Sep 28, 2026, exposing it to potential retaliatory economic measures. [E2]

Watch items

Whether Lithuania’s interior minister will succeed in restoring warning shots for police and border guards. [4]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 7 ·

Automated summary of 1 cited report and 1 World Monitor data point, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#26
Overall score62.6
Dimension coverage76%
ConfidenceStandard

Lithuania resilience analysis

Lithuania ranks #26 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 62.6 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 67.5, with structural readiness next at 75.9. Live shock exposure is strongest at 78.5, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 67.5. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.5 points. Dimension coverage is 76%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity2100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7076%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity71100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance73100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity7395%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance76100%Stale
Social cohesionSocial and governance7692%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security79100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water79100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity80100%Stale
Information environmentSocial and governance8255%Stale
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity87100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water9282%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance96100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity97100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Latvia (#25, 62.8), France (#27, 62.5), Germany (#24, 63.2), Montenegro (#28, 62.3). Comparisons in Europe: France (#27, 62.5), Latvia (#25, 62.8), Montenegro (#28, 62.3), Germany (#24, 63.2), Cyprus (#29, 61.9). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Lithuania has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Health, food and water, 84.9. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Lithuania

What is Lithuania's resilience score?

Lithuania scores 62.6 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #26 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Lithuania?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 67.5, followed by Structural readiness at 75.9. Their evidence coverage is 54% and 89%.

Is Lithuania's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.5 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Lithuania are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.