World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · OM

Oman country risk and resilience

Oman country risk and resilience: ranked #63 of 170 in World Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Oman instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputReconsider Travel
OFAC designations in feed32 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Oman on the live map →

Recent developments in Oman

Country brief

What this means for Oman

Oman's support for peaceful resolution of disputes is relevant given the Strait of Hormuz is a shipping chokepoint World Monitor tracks for Oman. [1][E4]

Key risks

Oman is linked to 32 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, as of Sep 28, 2026. [E2]

The most severe government travel advisory World Monitor tracks for Oman is Reconsider Travel, as of Sep 28, 2026. [E1]

Outlook

A Polymarket market related to Oman, "Iran-Oman Hormuz Agreement by October 31?", priced Yes at 23% on Sep 28, 2026; it closes Oct 31, 2026. [E5]

Watch items

Oman drafts national law for space economy. [4]

The outcome of the Polymarket market "Iran-Oman Hormuz Agreement by October 31?" is unresolved. [E5]

World Monitor data cited

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 4 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#63
Overall score56.5
Dimension coverage76%
ConfidenceStandard

Oman resilience analysis

Oman ranks #63 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 56.5 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 62.4, with structural readiness next at 68.7. Live shock exposure is strongest at 75.6, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 61.2. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +1.4 points. Dimension coverage is 76%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity11100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity24100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water5382%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance57100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance5855%Stale
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity66100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity67100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water68100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance7192%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity7276%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7390%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity7680%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance78100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity80100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance82100%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity87100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Belize (#62, 56.6), Malta (#64, 56.4), Malaysia (#61, 56.6), Bosnia and Herzegovina (#65, 56.2). Comparisons in the Middle East and North Africa: Malta (#64, 56.4), Israel (#53, 57.7), Jordan (#88, 52.9), Algeria (#94, 51.9), Saudi Arabia (#32, 61.6). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links Oman to Hormuz and Gulf security. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 93.3. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Oman

What is Oman's resilience score?

Oman scores 56.5 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #63 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Oman?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 62.4, followed by Structural readiness at 68.7. Their evidence coverage is 66% and 87%.

Is Oman's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +1.4 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Oman are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.