San Marino resilience evidence
San Marino has many observed European inputs, yet 4 dimension gaps leave a narrow but material break in this edition. The page therefore shows the measurements that exist and withholds the aggregate.
Source inventory gaps
Very small sovereign states do not receive a complete standalone record across these provider systems. For San Marino, UN Comtrade does not contribute an import-concentration observation. The social-cohesion feed from IEP, UNHCR, and UCDP is marked source unavailable in this snapshot. Reporters Without Borders supplies no information-environment value, and the World Bank debt slot is unmonitored. Those gaps leave coverage at 64%, 1 point under the 65% floor.
What the snapshot does cover
San Marino retains 15 dimension measurements backed by observed data: Macro-fiscal position 72 (95%); Currency and external balance 60 (85%); Trade policy resilience 76 (64%); Financial-system exposure 73 (76%); Cyber and digital capacity 100 (100%); Logistics and supply chains 100 (50%); Core infrastructure 79 (70%); Governance and institutions 72 (100%); Border security 95 (86%); Education capacity 63 (100%); Health and public services 80 (100%); Food and water security 93 (82%); Fiscal space 62 (100%); State continuity 83 (80%); Liquid-reserve adequacy 17 (100%). Source families on the covered side include IMF, World Bank, WTO, UCDP, and FAO IPC. These lines stay separate because the publication rule blocks an overall number.
Dimension evidence inventory
Showing 12 of 21 active dimensions, weakest evidence first; 6 more at full coverage; 3 omitted for brevity.
Energy system resilience is observed but below the 50% coverage a supported reading needs, so it is recorded here without counting as supported readings.
- Sovereign fiscal buffer: 0% coverage; not applicable.
- Information environment: 0% coverage; Reporters Without Borders does not contribute observed series for San Marino.
- Social cohesion: 21% coverage; IEP, UNHCR, and UCDP did not deliver a usable series in this snapshot.
- External-debt coverage: 30% coverage; World Bank does not contribute observed series for San Marino.
- Import concentration: 30% coverage; UN Comtrade does not contribute observed series for San Marino.
- Energy system resilience: 15% coverage; observed.
- Logistics and supply chains: 50% coverage; observed.
- Trade policy resilience: 64% coverage; observed.
- Core infrastructure: 70% coverage; observed.
- Financial-system exposure: 76% coverage; observed.
- State continuity: 80% coverage; observed.
- Food and water security: 82% coverage; observed.
Nearest ranked comparators
European ranked pages provide the comparison frame. Nearest ranked comparators: Belgium, Tajikistan, Romania, Azerbaijan, Estonia. Their complete published rows are reference cases, not estimates for San Marino.
Tracked crisis context
San Marino does not appear in a dedicated crawlable crisis tracker. The registry covers a fixed set of 14 crisis desks, so this omission is about tracker selection rather than national conditions.
Reading limits
This August 29, 2026 San Marino inventory uses pillar-combined-penalized-v1. A 64% coverage reading and 20% imputation share describe evidence quality only; no resilience total is released.
Questions about San Marino
What prevents a San Marino ranking?
Coverage is 64% because very small sovereign-state records from UN Comtrade, social-cohesion feeds, Reporters Without Borders, and the World Bank debt feed do not all provide usable standalone San Marino observations.
What evidence is available for San Marino?
15 dimensions have observed readings, among them Fiscal space, State continuity, and Liquid-reserve adequacy. They can support evidence review but not an unpublished aggregate.
Which comparisons help with San Marino?
Use the linked European ranked pages as published reference cases. Keep their national scores separate from San Marino source availability.