World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · ZA

South Africa country risk and resilience

South Africa country risk and resilience: ranked #114 of 170 in World Monitor's index, with live instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Official name: Republic of South Africa. Wikidata identity record.

Current signal

South Africa instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed48 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open South Africa on the live map →

Recent developments in South Africa

Country brief

What this means for South Africa

The mass shootings highlight security challenges that may affect South Africa's travel advisory, which is currently set at Exercise Increased Caution. [2][E1]

Key risks

South Africa's 48 sanctions designations pose a risk to its international financial and trade relations. [E2]

Outlook

A Polymarket market on whether Helen Zille will be the next mayor of Johannesburg is priced Yes at 66% as of Sep 28, 2026, and closes Nov 17, 2026. [E5]

Watch items

The outcome of the mass shootings investigation and any policy response remains unresolved. [2][3][4][5]

The Polymarket market on Helen Zille becoming the next mayor of Johannesburg will resolve by Nov 17, 2026. [E5]

World Monitor data cited

  • E1 · Travel advisory: Exercise Increased Caution ·
  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 48 ·
  • E5 · Polymarket prediction market: 66% ·

Automated summary of 4 cited reports and 3 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#114
Overall score48.2
Dimension coverage85%
ConfidenceStandard

South Africa resilience analysis

South Africa ranks #114 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 48.2 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 58.8, with live shock exposure next at 59.5. Structural readiness is strongest at 63.1, while Infrastructure is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 53.7. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0 points. Dimension coverage is 85%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure16100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity34100%Stale
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water47100%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity47100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance48100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure50100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance52100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity53100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity55100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity57100%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance5792%Stale
Food and water securityHealth, food and water6682%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity69100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance72100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7390%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance7555%Stale
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity76100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity7885%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity85100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure95100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Namibia (#113, 48.4), Bahamas (#115, 48.2), Egypt (#112, 48.7), Comoros (#116, 47.7). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Namibia (#113, 48.4), Comoros (#116, 47.7), Ghana (#110, 48.9), Zambia (#117, 47.5), Gambia (#118, 47.1). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

South Africa has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 73. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about South Africa

What is South Africa's resilience score?

South Africa scores 48.2 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #114 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for South Africa?

Recovery capacity is lowest at 58.8, followed by Live shock exposure at 59.5. Their evidence coverage is 63% and 94%.

Is South Africa's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect South Africa are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.