World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · GH

Ghana country risk and resilience

Ghana country risk and resilience: ranked #110 of 170 in World Monitor's Country Resilience Index, with live instability, travel-advisory and sanctions signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Ghana instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed3 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Ghana on the live map →

Recent developments in Ghana

Country brief

What this means for Ghana

The GH¢100m food buffer investment by NAFCO may help mitigate food supply disruptions, though Ghana's net energy import dependency of 0% suggests energy self-sufficiency does not shield it from climate-related shocks like the North East Gonja floods. [1][5][E3]

Key risks

Ghana is linked to 3 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations, which could complicate international trade and investment. [E2]

Watch items

The outcome of the Kalshi market on whether the NDC wins the Ghana parliamentary election, priced at 61% on Sep 28, 2026, with a close date of Dec 7, 2029. [E4]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 3 ·
  • E3 · Net energy import dependency: 0% ·
  • E4 · Kalshi prediction market: 61% ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 3 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#110
Overall score48.9
Dimension coverage85%
ConfidenceStandard

Ghana resilience analysis

Ghana ranks #110 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 48.9 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 58.9, with live shock exposure next at 62.3. Recovery capacity is strongest at 64.7, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 45. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +2 points. Dimension coverage is 85%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity6100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance20100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water43100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity45100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water47100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance50100%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure50100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure51100%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity5685%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity5880%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6192%Stale
State continuityRecovery capacity62100%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity68100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity70100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity71100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance78100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7890%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance8355%Stale
Import concentrationRecovery capacity87100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Turkmenistan (#109, 49.6), Sri Lanka (#111, 48.8), Honduras (#108, 49.7), Egypt (#112, 48.7). Comparisons in sub-Saharan Africa: Namibia (#113, 48.4), South Africa (#114, 48.2), Comoros (#116, 47.7), Zambia (#117, 47.5), Gambia (#118, 47.1). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Ghana has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 78. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Ghana

What is Ghana's resilience score?

Ghana scores 48.9 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #110 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Ghana?

Structural readiness is lowest at 58.9, followed by Live shock exposure at 62.3. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 97%.

Is Ghana's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +2 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Ghana are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.