World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · DJ

Djibouti country risk and resilience

Djibouti country risk and resilience: ranked #132 of 170 in World Monitor's resilience index, with live instability, advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Djibouti instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Increased Caution
OFAC designations in feed4 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Djibouti on the live map →

Recent developments in Djibouti

Country brief

What this means for Djibouti

The $660m fuel pipeline funded by Africa's richest man could reduce Djibouti's net energy import dependency of 0% by enabling domestic fuel handling. [1][E3]

Djibouti's appeal for global support amid an influx of Yemeni refugees is complicated by its link to 4 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations. [3][E2]

Key risks

Djibouti's link to 4 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations may deter international aid for the refugee influx. [E2]

Watch items

Whether the $660m fuel pipeline between Ethiopia and Djibouti will proceed as planned. [1]

Whether global support will materialize for Djibouti amid the influx of refugees from Yemen. [3]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 4 ·
  • E3 · Net energy import dependency: 0% ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#132
Overall score43.6
Dimension coverage83%
ConfidenceStandard

Djibouti resilience analysis

Djibouti ranks #132 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 43.6 out of 100. Live shock exposure is the weakest pillar at 54.5, with structural readiness next at 56.2. Recovery capacity is strongest at 59.3, while Health, food and water is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 41. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.5 points. Dimension coverage is 83%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity0100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance1180%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure16100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water29100%Fresh
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance33100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance3355%Stale
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity40100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure40100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water53100%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity56100%Stale
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity6085%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity61100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity6180%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance6192%Stale
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity68100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance77100%Stale
Energy system resilienceEnergy security8270%Fresh
Import concentrationRecovery capacity82100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure100100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Sierra Leone (#131, 44.2), Tunisia (#133, 43.5), Rwanda (#130, 44.4), Côte d’Ivoire (#134, 43.5). Comparisons in the Middle East and North Africa: Tunisia (#133, 43.5), Lebanon (#127, 45), Libya (#126, 45), Turkey (#125, 45.1), Bahrain (#122, 46.3). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links Djibouti to Red Sea security. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 82. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Djibouti

What is Djibouti's resilience score?

Djibouti scores 43.6 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #132 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Djibouti?

Live shock exposure is lowest at 54.5, followed by Structural readiness at 56.2. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 88%.

Is Djibouti's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.5 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Djibouti are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.