World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · KZ

Kazakhstan country risk and resilience

Kazakhstan country risk and resilience: ranked #54 of 170 in World Monitor's index, with current instability, travel advisories, sanctions and security signals. The structural snapshot is dated and source-labelled; the live monitor loads separately.

Current signal

Kazakhstan instability monitor

Published partial pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score—No current score
24-hour comparison-window movementUnavailable
Travel advisory inputExercise Normal Precautions
OFAC designations in feed24 designated entities
Live enhancement pending
Open Kazakhstan on the live map →

Recent developments in Kazakhstan

Country brief

What this means for Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan's net energy export status of -119% indicates strong energy security despite regional military appointments [3][E3]

Key risks

Kazakhstan is linked to 24 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations as of Sep 28, 2026 [E2]

Watch items

Kazakhstan Takes Part in Abraham Accords Meeting as Trump-Promised Signing Awaits [2]

World Monitor data cited

  • E2 · US OFAC and Canada SEMA designations: 24 ·
  • E3 · Net energy import dependency: -119% ·

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 2 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#54
Overall score57.5
Dimension coverage78%
ConfidenceStandard

Kazakhstan resilience analysis

Kazakhstan ranks #54 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 57.5 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 65.1, with recovery capacity next at 68.2. Live shock exposure is strongest at 75.9, while Economic capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 65. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.9 points. Dimension coverage is 78%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Information environmentSocial and governance4555%Stale
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance46100%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity55100%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity5595%Fresh
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity58100%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water59100%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity6065%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity61100%Stale
Social cohesionSocial and governance6692%Stale
Import concentrationRecovery capacity69100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7390%Fresh
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity7485%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water7982%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity79100%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance82100%Stale
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity85100%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure86100%Fresh
Education capacitySocial and governance9780%Fresh
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure10050%Fresh
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Israel (#53, 57.7), Mongolia (#55, 57.4), Solomon Islands (#52, 58.3), Brazil (#56, 57.4). Comparisons in Europe: Georgia (#59, 56.8), Azerbaijan (#50, 58.8), Bosnia and Herzegovina (#65, 56.2), Romania (#49, 58.9), Tajikistan (#48, 59.2). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

Kazakhstan has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Infrastructure, 87. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Kazakhstan

What is Kazakhstan's resilience score?

Kazakhstan scores 57.5 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #54 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Kazakhstan?

Structural readiness is lowest at 65.1, followed by Recovery capacity at 68.2. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 58%.

Is Kazakhstan's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.9 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Kazakhstan are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Geopolitical risk dashboard comparison · Free Geopolitical Risk Dashboards.