World Monitor — real-time global intelligence dashboard with live markets, geopolitical data, and infrastructure monitoring

Country · IR

Iran Country Instability Index

Iran's Country Instability Index is 63/100 · Elevated, down 5 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of .

CII measures current stress. World Monitor's separate Country Resilience Index measures Iran's longer-term structural capacity.

Current signal

Iran instability monitor

Published pulse

Instability combines current information, unrest, conflict and security-mobility signals. It is separate from structural resilience; do not combine the scores.

Instability score63Elevated
24-hour comparison-window movementFalling -5
Travel advisory inputDo Not Travel
OFAC designations in feed1,671 designated entities
Open Iran on the live map →

Recent developments in Iran

Iran's Country Instability Index is 63/100 · Elevated, down 5 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of . Reporting captured in the same window is listed below.

Country brief

What this means for Iran

The stalemate in US-Iran peace talks and Trump's rejection of the truce proposal increase the risk of continued instability, as Iran has a Country Instability Index score of 63 of 100. [1][5][E1]

Key risks

Iran's 1,671 US OFAC and Canada SEMA sanctions designations expose it to ongoing economic and diplomatic pressure. [E3]

Outlook

A Polymarket market related to Iran, "Will Iran target an Arab country by September 30, 2026?", priced Yes at 30% on Sep 28, 2026; it closes Sep 30, 2026. [E6]

A Polymarket market related to Iran, "Will Iran target Kuwait by September 30, 2026?", priced Yes at 22% on Sep 28, 2026; it closes Sep 30, 2026. [E7]

World Monitor data cited

Automated summary of 2 cited reports and 4 World Monitor data points, generated .

Structural resilience snapshot

Rank#162
Overall score34.5
Dimension coverage71%
ConfidenceStandard

Iran resilience analysis

Iran ranks #162 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 34.5 out of 100. Structural readiness is the weakest pillar at 38.9, with recovery capacity next at 41.4. Live shock exposure is strongest at 67.9, while Economic capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 35.7. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at +0.1 points. Dimension coverage is 71%, and the page labels confidence as standard.

Pillar profile

Six-domain profile

Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first

DimensionDomainScoreCoverageEvidence state
Currency and external balanceEconomic capacity085%Fresh
Financial-system exposureEconomic capacity1576%Fresh
State continuityRecovery capacity17100%Stale
Governance and institutionsSocial and governance24100%Fresh
Information environmentSocial and governance2755%Stale
Logistics and supply chainsInfrastructure3150%Fresh
Fiscal spaceRecovery capacity4165%Fresh
Macro-fiscal positionEconomic capacity4295%Fresh
Social cohesionSocial and governance44100%Stale
Education capacitySocial and governance47100%Fresh
Food and water securityHealth, food and water6082%Fresh
Border securitySocial and governance63100%Stale
Import concentrationRecovery capacity64100%Fresh
Energy system resilienceEnergy security7090%Fresh
Health and public servicesHealth, food and water70100%Fresh
Core infrastructureInfrastructure7970%Fresh
Cyber and digital capacityInfrastructure80100%Fresh
Trade policy resilienceEconomic capacity100100%Fresh
External-debt coverageRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Fuel-stock bufferRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Liquid-reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—30%Unmonitored
Reserve adequacyRecovery capacity—0%Unavailable
Sovereign fiscal bufferRecovery capacity—0%Not applicable

Comparison set

Nearest ranked peers: Chad (#161, 35.7), Afghanistan (#163, 34), Burkina Faso (#160, 36.5), Niger (#164, 33.8). Comparisons in the Middle East and North Africa: Iraq, Yemen (#167, 29.6), Tunisia (#133, 43.5), Djibouti (#132, 43.6), Syria. Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.

Tracked crisis context

The crisis registry links Iran to Iran–Israel escalation, Hormuz and Gulf security. Tracker scopes are fixed and do not cover every crisis.

Reading limits

Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 70. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.

Questions about Iran

What is Iran's Country Instability Index?

Iran's Country Instability Index is 63/100 (Elevated), down 5 points over a 24-hour comparison window, as of Sep 28, 2026, 4:51 AM UTC.

What is Iran's resilience score?

Iran scores 34.5 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #162 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.

Which resilience pillars are weakest for Iran?

Structural readiness is lowest at 38.9, followed by Recovery capacity at 41.4. Their evidence coverage is 90% and 41%.

Is Iran's resilience score rising or falling?

The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of +0.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.

Related chokepoint trackers

How to read this page

The 0-100 index records the August 29, 2026 snapshot. See the Country Resilience Index methodology for dimensions, sources and confidence rules. Published revisions that affect Iran are in the corrections log.

This 2026-08-29 snapshot applies domain design weights inside pillar aggregation. Earlier published CRI numbers used coverage-only member aggregation and are not directly comparable.

Use this dated reference with the live map for active alerts, conflict, market and energy signals. Neither score on this page is a forecast; where World Monitor does forecast, the graded record is on the forecast accuracy scorecard.

Download: resilience.json. Source: World Monitor Country Resilience Index snapshot, August 29, 2026. Methodology: Country Resilience Index.

How World Monitor compares: Liveuamap Alternatives · World Monitor vs Liveuamap.